![]() |
FACT: Aerial photo: Netzarim Junction firefight scene |
Independent German TV investigation of the infamous shooting, months ago, of the 12 yr. old boy, Muhammed al-Dura, in Gaza couldn't ignore the physical evidence: that al-Dura was "probably" shot not by the IDF – but by 'Palestinian' "friendly" fire.
World media published al-Dura's picture world-wide, in the arms of his father under fire, irresponsibly swallowing 'Palestinian' PR that blamed the IDF for shooting the boy.
Note that the several bullet holes in the wall (left side of photo) go straight into the wall – from the Arab positions (from where the photo was taken!, "A" in aerial photo), NOT from the Israelis ("IDF stronghold" in aerial photo) who were to the right as clearly evidenced by how they're hiding from the Israelis. If the bullets were coming from the Israelis out of the photo to the right, the bullets would have grazed the wall, leaving a line, not a round hole. Furthermore, the only way the Israeli soldiers could possibly have killed the boy would have been to shoot through the barrier, which was not hit, and through the father, who was not harmed!!!
In the aerial photo of the scene of the firefight at Netzarim Junction, I've marked the location of the shooter with the red button marked "A." It's stretching physics greatly even to suggest the shots could have come from the point I've marked with the red button marked "B." Even that wouldn't have produced the nice round holes that can be seen in the wall around the father and boy. The shots came from perpendicular to the wall – which is the button I marked "A." Note that the father is looking out directly perpendicular to the wall at the "friendly" photographer documenting the "murder" – and trying to process the reality that it was a "friendly" terrorist who was shooting at them!
Before the Arab propagandists edited the videos and pulled the photos on Arab websites, the betrayed and incredulous father was seen pleading – in the direction directly perpendicular to the wall (!!!) – for the "friend" to stop shooting; pleading with what he regarded as a "friendly" fighter, not the IDF "enemy" (for whom he would simply have waved a cloth in the air to surrender). Clearly, this French photographer and the Palestinian shooter (more likely shooters) were hidden from the view of the IDF position and there's no way an IDF soldier could have taken up that position to do the shooting. It could only have been a deliberate murder to create a "shaheed" for PR.
Even the edited video on Arab websites shows the nice round holes being made in the wall around the father and boy, shots that could only have come from directly perpendicular to the wall. After a number of misses, someone opened up with a machine gun, killing the boy without killing the father. Magic!
Now tell me how it could have been accidental! No miss at Israeli positions could have killed the boy. 'Palestinian' gunmen deliberately "produced" a "shaheed" (martyr) for the "greater good" of Islamic propaganda.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |