 |
| Pâ•qidꞋ Yi•rᵊmᵊyâhꞋu |
2005.06.28 – A contradiction between the Quantum Theory of the very small and the Relativity Theory of the very large implies that there is no continuum. In other words, there has to be at least one point of transition.
There are two ways of resolving this question: [1] detect and describe a point of transition or [2] show that there is no transition. I think there’s a possible way to accomplish the latter, which I will try to describe in simple terms.
Today’s science describes the behavior of many atoms well enough to predict how they will behave in various combinations. We can define a model of atoms that we can test in a laboratory up to a certain scale and simulate by computer to nearly any scale desired. If these simulations mimic the real universe then we should have a realistic theory. If this theory isn’t correct, it should rapidly diverge from the results in the real universe.
To start, let’s assume one atom, each, of three elements that are simplest to describe and designate the first atom of element a as a1, the first atom of element b as b1 and the first atom of element c as c1. So, we have three atoms to play with: a1, b1 and c1.
Scientists can describe the behavior of each of these three atoms separately and confirm the behavior of each under a sophisticated microscope. For our proof, we will need to derive two sets of behaviors: the internal atomic behavior and the external affect on the environment of the collection of atoms as an object, both of which scientists can determine and describe.
Now the scientists can combine these three atoms in all of their permutations (there are six, so far) and describe these two sets of behaviors for each object resulting from each of the combinations of these atoms. At this point, we have six objects, each of which have two associated descriptions of their behavior. To proceed, we must begin to label these as object O1 with associated behaviors O1a and O1b through object O6 with associated behaviors O6a and O6b.
This sets up a framework for a discrete mathematical proof. The strategy is, mathematically, to add one atom at a time, from this point, which is well-defined, to infinity, showing that no point can be found in which either the internal atomic behavior or the external affect on the object and its environment can be shown. We do this by allowing two different variables, i and j, to represent any two numbers one wishes to choose (such that j = i + 1) between object1 and objectinfinity and showing that for any i and j selected that we’re able to measure, quantify and describe, there is no difference between Oia and Oja or between Oib and Ojb.
If this is viable it would have a number of implications:
Applying mathematical inputs that exert sub- or super-physical forces, while they represent forces that may indeed exist, must produce results that aren’t physical, existing only in a non-dimensional realm. The forces represented by those numbers, too, though they may also exist, cannot be physical and can only exist in a non-dimensional realm.
If the previous premise is true then non-dimensional forces can affect our physical universe
Effects that seem to defy the laws of Quantum physics must, like the conversion between matter and energy, involve some conversion between physical and non-physical (dark matter?), in which the non-physical aspects aren’t constrained by Quantum physics but affect our perceptions (relativity) of the physical objects. This is alternately described as conversion between the dimensional universe and the non-dimensional, or spiritual, realm.
Object behavior would seem to be the kind of “averaged” behaviors of its composite atoms as described by some physicists.
Since identical conditions affect the extremely small and the extremely large identically at both atomic and object levels, there is a continuum and quantum atomic behavior is compatible with relativistic object behavior.
If the previous premise is true, that implies that combinations of non-dimensional forces and conversions grossly affect our relative perspectives of the physical universe
Time, while existing in both past and future along with the present, is in a non-dimensional realm that cannot be traversed by physical objects. Indeed, while future already exists in a non-dimensional realm, the future doesn’t yet exist in the physical universe. (See next section.)
Because place is an inextricable element of time-space, traversing space and time are equally accessible.
Traversing any time and place is as possible as a true out-of-body experience. (Whether that’s possible is an entirely different question.)
 |
|
 |