 |
| Pâ•qidꞋ Yi•rᵊmᵊyâhꞋu |
2006.08.20 1610 – The only way to begin to understand a Muslim terrorist is to learn to relate to him – or her – in their perspective, which means relating to them in the same terms that they use, the way that they mean them and understand them.
The world cannot long prevail against Islamic Ji•hâdꞋ Mu•jâ•hid•unꞋ, whether Sunni or Shiite (much less the pincer combination), as long as it remains in denial, referring to barbaric Mu•jâ•hid•unꞋ terrorists who routinely commit war crimes as mere "militants" and framing the war against Ji•hâdꞋ as some vague war against some nebulous nefarious notion of "terror" having neither personification nor address.
Mu•jâ•hid•unꞋ have globalized the theater of war, inviting destruction and death into their own villages and homes while attacking non-combatants in the general public world-wide. Mu•jâ•hid•unꞋ celebrate not only their own Is•ti•shᵊhâdꞋ, they also delight in plunging their families into the kill-zones of fighting. Mu•jâ•hid•unꞋ deliberately put their elderly and their spouses in the line of fire. Mu•jâ•hid•unꞋ train-up child soldiers from the cradle and commit child sacrifice, even conspiring to blow up their own babies as human sacrifices to their Ji•hâdꞋ. This war is fundamentally different than any previous wars in the modern era.
Zeal of this magnitude cannot be generated by ordinary nationalism, economics, politics – or "freedom and democracy." Such suicidal zeal, even to sacrifice one's spouse and children, has never been seen before and hasn't even been approached since the medieval Crusades and Islamic wars – religious wars. While warfare in Viet Nam and similar wars have shared many of the guerrilla tactics, none have produced wide-scale eagerness to become a Shâ•hidꞋ, to sacrifice elderly relatives, or spouses, or children or babies. Such total commitment can only be generated by promises of unimaginable post-death reward: religion. Mu•jâ•hid•unꞋ make little secret that this is a religious war. This is also evident not only in that all Mu•jâ•hidꞋ terrorists are Muslims, but two other ways as well: [1] some converts to Islam have become Mu•jâ•hidꞋ terrorists and [2] the only Mu•jâ•hidꞋ terrorists who have reformed are religious converts OUT of Islam!!!
The claim that Islamic hatred of the west results from western foreign policy is conspicuously blatant propaganda, yet the western Left is gullible enough to believe whatever Arabs claim – from a massacre in Jenin to the American administration lying to the American public about Iraqi WMDs. For the truly ignorant Left, all nukes are WMDs but not all WMDs are nukes. The math is that the existence of chemical weapons was proven by Saddam's usage of them and a significant percentage of them were never accounted for. Only those who can't do third grade arithmetic or don't know what WMD means argue differently.
Viet Nam, Gaza, Iraq and Lebanon have all consistently pointed toward an inexorable proof that a guerrilla insurgency, particularly non-uniformed "civilians" entrenched in the "non-combatant" population, cannot be defeated by conventional rules of warfare because there is no uniformed military to confront and fight. That should be conspicuously evident. One factor that is consistently spun by propagandists is "collective punishment." However, collective punishment can only be predicated on collective innocence. When there is collective guilt, then punishment is merited. Driven by western naïveté that has never grasped Asian or Middle Eastern thinking, the western Left, with Hollywood in the forefront, applies their movie-mentality to wrongly assume that the civilian population are uninvolved neutrals deserving of the title "innocent civilians." They weren't in Viet Nam and they aren't in Gaza or Iraq. In each of these, as well as in the Arab-occupied West Bank, the "civilian population" are eager supporters and collaborators complicit in "the resistance" – a euphemism to camouflage the meaning from Western Christians but clear to Arabs and other Muslims: "the Ji•hâdꞋ to eliminate Israel from the Middle East."
This should have been clear to the world when Gaza and the Arab-occupied West Bank voted Hamas Mu•jâ•hid•unꞋ as their representatives. Muslim intentions should be clear from Iran's, Khizb-Allah's and Hamas' unambiguous declarations to "wipe Israel off the map."
Yet, when a guerrilla insurgency violates an international border and stages an unprovoked attack, killing three soldiers and taking two others hostages, misinformed Christians ignore the victim, Biblical Israel and Jews, to shower their compassion on the evil predators. That is miso-Judaism!
"Woe to those who say that wrong is good or good is wrong."
Though Israel was the attacked victim, US discussion today is not about right and wrong but, rather, focused on being quicker than Khizb-Allah to financially help the Lebanese Khizb-Allah supporters and collaborators who enabled the predators to flourish instead of helping the victim of the initial attack: Biblical Israel. Worse, the U.N. condemnation of Israel's response implies that there are no circumstances under which Israel has a right to defend herself. Exactly the opposite, the U.N. exposes its anti-Israel stance by ignoring Iran's and Syria's rearming of Khizb-Allah in direct contravention of U.N. Resolutions 1559 and 1701 and, instead, condemns Israel for enforcing the U.N. resolutions while the U.N. – France, in particular– refuses to do so. These resolutions were never anything more than transparent ruses to hamstring Israel, ruses that the drafters began unraveling and abandoning the next day. It gets still worse. Now, the U.N. brazenly threatens to accomplish what the Arabs could not: place Islamic armies committed to the elimination of Israel (Malaysia and Indonesia) on our northern border, setting the stage for Armageddon. Meanwhile, the U.S. has completely lost its sense of right and wrong, its moral compass, from hedonism, infanticide and sodomy to myriad debaucheries – becoming the modern Sodom. Instead, America now markets its replacement morality, democracy, to the highest bidder, failing to understand that Mu•jâ•hid•unꞋ are masters in manipulating the predictable hedonism of the western public to destroy Israel while, in the same stroke, undermining and destroying western countries both from within and without.
It is clear from this that the first line of Muslim offense relies on the U.N. to step in and separate the warring sides before the West's superior military can deal a decisive blow, vanquish the guerrilla insurgency and eliminate the prospect of an eternal war of attrition which the West, absorbed in hedonism, lacks the national endurance needed to win. Hence, Muslims calculate that, by weathering 60-75 days in bomb shelters, they will win the war – and they've been right.
This combination of conditions leads inexorably to only one formula that can achieve victory against a guerrilla insurgency that enjoys the support of the local population: inflict disproportionate, overwhelming and unbearable punishment, including the supporting population of "civilian" guerrilla supporters, in an extended war of attrition – measured in decades or centuries, until the guerrillas sign a surrender – not a hudꞋna – under terms dictated solely by the victor, and disarm!
There is another implication: escape from a terrible swift and crushing stroke involving many "collateral" deaths of "civilian" terrorists (human shields, etc.), can only be achieved through changing the U.N., whose intervention has become an integral part of guerrilla-insurgency strategizing.
 |
|
 |
