The pârâsh•âh′ is Dәvâr•im′ 4.25-40.
The Haphtâr•at′ Teimân•it′ is Yir•mәyâh′u ha-Nâ•vi′ 6.16-17; 8.13 — 9.23. (The Sәphârâd•it′ and Ash•kәnaz′it selection is only Yirmәyâh′u ha-Nâ•vi′ 8.13 — 9.23.)
This 24-hr. fast (from eve to evening) commemorates the breaching of the walls of Yәrushâ•la′yim in the time of the first Beit ha-Miq•dâsh′ (Yirmәyâh′u 39.2, where the date is the 9th) and Titus' breaching the walls of Yәrushâ•la′yim during the time of the second Beit ha-Miq•dâsh′.
The Mish′nâh (Ma•sëk′ët Ta•an•it′ 29a) enumerates five disasters on the 9th of Fifthmonth [Babylonian "Av"]
The expulsion of the Jews from Spain in 1492 is said also to have occurred on the 9th of Fifthmonth. ("Av, the ninth of," Ency. Jud., 3.936).
Tish•a′ bә-Av is a day of mourning and fasting from sunset to sunset, in commemoration of the destruction of both Bât•ei′-ha-Miq•dâsh′. "The general rule in the Tal•mud′ for the mourning rites of [Tish•a′ bә-Av] is that a person is obliged to observe on it all mourning rites which apply in the case of the death of a next of kin (Ma•sëk′ët Ta•an•it′ 30a)" (Ency. Jud., ibid.).
In addition to remembering these tragedies, the following reasons to fast on the 9th of Fifthmonth are also sometimes asserted.
Relative to the remembrance of si•nat′ khi•nâm′, this isn't, and has never been, a central theme of the 9th of Fifthmonth remembrance. Si•nat′ khi•nâm′ has never been more than a rarely mentioned afterthought relative to the 9th of Fifthmonth.
Not only the Arabs and other Muslims, but all misojudaics would simply maintain that this is a fable made up by Jews and doesn't qualify as historic evidence… and on the last point, they're right. The lack of historical evidence fails to convince outside of the yәshiv•âh′.
Since the reunification of Yәrushâ•la′yim, as a result of the 1967 War, a number have rabbis suggested the 9th of Fifthmonth should no longer be a fast day because Rav Papa stated that the 9th of Fifthmonth and the minor fast days will become days of rejoicing (Tal•mud′, Ma•sëk′ët Rosh ha-Shân•âh′ 18b).
However, these rabbis seem unaware that Rav Papa wasn't his own authority. He was commenting on Zәkhar•yâh′ ha-Nâ•vi′ 8.19. If the 9th of Fifthmonth and the other three days mentioned in that pâ•suq′ are declared for the Jews ("the house of Yәhud•âh′") "for joy and rejoicing" then it will be because Zәkhar•yâh′ ha-Nâ•vi′ said so, not Rav Papa; and Rav Papa's suggestion is merely an interpretive rhetorical question.
As for the question that Rav Papa asked, Rib′i Yәho•shu′a had already answered it. If peace is the interpretation of "joy and rejoicing" then that peace must be restricted to the same specification stipulated for the "joy and rejoicing": "for the house of Yәhud•âh′" (and not, as Christians imagine, the goy•im′ world).
And what is the peace, joy and rejoicing of the Jews? The promised, Biblically prophesied redemption. Rib′i Yәho•shu′a taught that redemption has two aspects: national (as Jews have always known) and personal. National redemption occurred in 1948. But peace, joy and rejoicing exist not external to a person but as a state of mind. There are people who can be tortured in tranquil surroundings of peace, joy and rejoicing and other people who can experience peace, joy and rejoicing in the midst of torturous persecutions.
Nәviy•im′ | Translation | Mid•râsh′ Rib′i Yәho•shu′a (NHM) | NHM | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Then, coming out, Rib′i Yәho•shu′a was proceeding from the Beit ha-Miq•dâsh′ 24.1.1 and his tal•mid•im′ 5.1.1 came near to show him the buildings of the Beit ha-Miq•dâsh′ complex. Replying,24.2.1 he said to them, "Don't you behold all of these things? •mein′! I tell you, it shall all be demolished. Not one stone upon another shall be left remaining there." 24.2.2 | 24.2 |
Yirmәyâh′u ha-Nâ•vi′ (7.14 above) unavoidably implied that the Beit ha-Miq•dâsh′ [1] was merely an appurtenance, not a core essential (since 'ä neither requires a physical dwelling nor eats physical sacrifices and Yis•râ•eil′ would survive in its absence) and [2] Yis•râ•eil′ was mistaking it for the central focus, displacing and supplanting 'ä.
Ergo, absent the physical Beit ha-Miq•dâsh′, what then is the eternal Beit ha-Miq•dâsh′ described by Yәkhëz•qeil′ ha-Nâ•vi′? Yet another non-essential appurtenance-temptation to distract Yis•râ•eil′ to trust men, buildings and a human system (do even some excessive rabbis come to mind?) instead of 'ä?
Rather, the stones of the eternal Beit ha-Miq•dâsh′ are the nәphâsh•ot′ of Yis•râ•eil′, the nëph′ësh of the Mâ•shi′akh being
àÆáÆï îÈàÂñåÌ äÇáÌåÉðÄéí; äÈéÀúÈä, ìÀøÉàùÑ ôÌÄðÈä:
Tor•âh′, and Rib′i Yәho•shu′a, taught that redemption — for a Jew — was a matter of personal tәshuv•âh′ to the practice of Tor•âh′, the standard set by ha-Sheim′ as a requirement for Him, through His khës′ëd, to bestow upon the individual Jew a place in ha-O•lam′ ha-•Ba′. (For non-Jews, it is learning, and conforming one's life practice to, Tor•âh′ rather than tәshuv•âh′ to Tor•âh′. Otherwise, the same Tor•âh′ applies, as appropriate, to both Jew and non-Jew.)
Considerable range has developed among Orthodox Yәhud•im′ in the observance of the 9th of Fifthmonth.
Thus, since Rib′i Yәho•shu′a, as the Mâ•shi′akh of ha-Sheim′, has revealed the redemption of ha-Sheim′, the cited pâ•suq′ has been fulfilled and it would seem that a strong argument can be made that the four minor fasts cited (these do NOT include Yom Ki•pur′) should transition to occasions "for joy and rejoicing."
![]() |
![]() |
When with mainstream Orthodox Jews, however, tal•mid•ei′ Nәtzâr•im′ must accommodate their particular practice concerning the following traditional rites:
According to tradition, this öåí concludes three weeks of mourning, which began with the öåí of the 17th of Fourthmonth (Babylonian "Tammuz").
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |