מִזבֵּחַ

Updated: 2018.05.13

4-Qᵊrân•ōtꞋ Mi•zᵊbeiꞋakh Tël Bᵊeir ShëvꞋa – reconstructed from original remnants. Original was probably hollow, housing an oven for a fire and equipped with a bronze (later iron) grate to support the sacrificial animal being grilled. The qᵊrân•ōtꞋ were likely angled outward at the outside corners to fa­cilitate tying-down the sacrificial animal. The Mi•zᵊbeiꞋ­akh of the Beit ha-Mi•qᵊdâshꞋ was bronze-plated (photo: Dr. Avishai Teicher, Pikiwiki, Israel)

Mi•zᵊbeiꞋakh; altar.

• מִזְבַּח הַנְּחשֶׁת, also called מִזְבַּח הָעוֹלָה

• מִזְבַּח הַזָּהָב, also called מִזְבַּח הַקְּטֹרֶת

Among all ancient peoples, their מִזבֵּחַ was the dining table of their deity—and all other altars were dining tables of rival demons. A diner's religion and nëphꞋësh was determined by which מִזבֵּחַ his or her table identified – to which they offered blessings.

"The [shul•khânꞋ] upon which food is served became identified in Jewish traditional thought with the [מִזבֵּחַ of the Beit ha-Miq•dâshꞋ]. 'When the [Beit ha-Miq•dâshꞋ] stood, sacrifices would secure [ki•purꞋ] for an individual; now his [shul•khânꞋ] does' (Tal•mudꞋ Bav•liꞋ Ma•sëkꞋët Khagig•âhꞋ 27a), was the way it was put by one Talmudic Sage.

(This symbolic identification explains the widespread custom among Jews of not sitting down upon a [shul•khânꞋ]; it explains the custom among some of sprinkling salt upon the first morsel of bread eaten—just as was required of the ancient sacrifices; or of removing all knives from the [shul•khânꞋ] before the recitation of grace because knives and swords—symbols of war and violence—were forbidden on the [מִזבֵּחַ], a symbol of peace; it is even one of the reasons given for the ritual washing before the meal—which is done not only for reasons of cleanliness but also to symbolize the ritual purity required of the [Kohan•imꞋ] when they officiated at the offerings.)

Even during the meal we are directed to raise the level of the conversation, as befitting the sacred symbolism of the [shul•khânꞋ]. 'Three who eat together and no words of Tor•âhꞋ are exchanged, it is as though they ate from pagan offerings… But if three have eaten at a [shul•khânꞋ] and spoke words of Tor•âhꞋ, it is as though they ate at the [Shul•khânꞋ] of [י--ה] (Ma•sëkꞋët Âv•otꞋ 2.4). The Birk•atꞋ ha-Mâ•zonꞋ, the grace after meals is in fact a minimal satisfaction of this requirement. But the imagery is always in terms of [a מִזבֵּחַ]; and the very act of eating is [thereby elevated to] a form of offering to [י--ה], at which appropriate [tᵊphil•otꞋ] are recited before and after…

As it was forbidden to bring certain animals upon the [מִזבֵּחַ] of [י--ה], so is it forbidden to do so upon the [Shul•khânꞋ]." (Donin, R. Hayim Halevy, To Be a Jew (New York: Basic Books, 1972), p. 101).

Har ha-•BaꞋyit: view of Har ha-Zeit•imꞋ from ancient site of the Mi•zᵊbeiꞋakh ha-QᵊtorꞋët

"In the days of the [Beit ha-Miq•dâshꞋ], the מִזבֵּחַ served to [provide ki•purꞋ] for us; now it is our table that [provides ki•purꞋ] for us" (Tal•mudꞋ Bav•liꞋ Ma•sëkꞋët Khagig•âhꞋ 27a)." While a superficial understanding of this statement is patently false (since ki•purꞋ depends upon tᵊshuv•âhꞋ), a more thorough familiarity with this concept understands that tᵊshuv•âhꞋ precedes partaking from the מִזבֵּחַ (table), and is, therefore, implied.

See also Shul•khânꞋ (table).

© 1996-present by Paqid Yirmeyahu Ben-David,
Google+ registered author & publisher
Google+ Nᵊtzâr•imꞋ page